Facetime sex now no registry No regristratio sex chat
There was never any suggestion or evidence (nor would there be) that I had ever contacted children online or attempted to abuse or conduct contact offences or promote or distribute Images.
It seems however that CS consider my crimes to be on par with child rapists etc.
As a bit of background both my wife and I are university educated and both held good jobs with firms in the Big four accountancy practices.
We had a joint income of around £130K up until recently when I was fired and had no history of drink or drug problems and no other dysfunction or previous arrests or convictions.
What is confusing is that the lady who supervises sex offenders who initially met with me when i met with the offender management unit police officer has told me that other men she deals with who have been convicted of indecent images possession are allowed unsupervised access as it would be 'unreasonable and unworkable' to expect otherwise. What view would a family court judge take to balance the human right to a family life with CS's opinions on my level of risk?
It is worth noting that the crown court judge did have powers at his disposal to impose restrictions on me having unsupervised access to children and/or other impositions on behaviour in the community but chose NOT to impose any such SOPOThanks for reading. FYI i do have a solicitor dealing with the PLO but it would be helpful to know what is a typical outcome in these circumstances. Suzie will obviously be the best help for you here, but I just wanted to say having read your message that CS will be looking for your wife to completely and utterly admit and agree that you pose a risk. They do not want her to be seen to defend you above her own children, they want to see she is putting them first and that she understands you pose a risk, however small, to the children.
They informed us that they were raising the case status to child protection and also public law outline (PLO) at the same time.
At the moment CS are dragging everything out having multiple meetings for both child protection and PLO where the exact same information is laboriously repeated.
My question to the forum is this; how would I go about challenging (legally) CS's seemingly concrete decision that I would never be allowed to supervise my children alone?Whether it's a salesperson, frenemy, or someone you just need a digital break from for a bit, Apple lets you limit the communication received from the outside world.If you have people or unknown, annoying numbers that you'd prefer not to see messages or receive phone and Facetime calls from, follow the instructions below. But a perceptive friend might notice that they can never get a hold of you.“Some mums also feel that other family members are seeing their baby before they are as they are too poorly to move.
So, please be nice but I desperately need some advice about the long term implications of my family's situation.We are of course not going to do this as I understand complying with CS is the only option at the moment to not risk a care order.